TOD: 11:47 pm
Temporarily lifting the gif ban because there’s no other way to show you this amazing close-up. It’s more striking on a larger screen, obviously, but you get the idea.
This is a good example of the sharp upswing in filmmaking sophistication between The Sheik in 1921 and Son of the Sheik in 1926 that I mentioned in this post. In the first, the cinematography was much more utilitarian and static, whether because they hadn’t yet learned the techniques or because they didn’t have the equipment, I don’t know. In the sequel, the photography becomes much more evocative and bold, creating tension and helping shape the narrative.
Temporarily lifting the gif ban because there’s no other way to show you this amazing close-up. It’s more striking on a...
This is honestly one of the sexiest scenes I’ve ever watched in a film, silent or otherwise.